European Cooperation in Social Science Data Dissemination
6. Strengthening the Infrastructure for Social Research
Social
research is normally conducted by project teams in small institutes,
rarely exceeding five to ten people. In addition, work contracts for staff
members are limited to four or to eight years. These restrictions hardly
allow to concentrate and to preserve the expertise required for
comparative research within one institute. Complex research designs, e.g.
for large panel studies and further diversification in useful technology,
make it impossible to maintain high standards in all fields. This
situation can be remedied if the research teams can lean on external
expertise of social science infrastructure institutes when needed for
particular steps in the research process.
Previous
attempts to construct time series from already existing data show that
attitudinal variables are seldom measured in a directly comparable form.
In many cases, this even holds true for data sets generated by one and the
same institute over time. While tribute has to be paid to diversity of
societies, this obvious lack of standardisation prevents social research
from becoming cumulative. Beyond well known socio-psychological scales,
greater emphasis should be on indicator testing and calibration, sensitive
to cultural specifics and functional equivalency. From this, an increasing
consistency should result when applying identical variables for measuring
phenomena over space and time. While individual creativity in research
design and in formulating questions is appreciated, conceptual and
technical deficits in data representation and documentation are a
superfluous obstacle for efficient use of available data.
Obviously, integration and diversity in the integration process of
European societies offer almost unlimited chances for creativity of
research and new demands on the social science infrastructure. This
challenging world continuously demands vigorous scrutiny of priorities,
procedures and outcomes.
 |